The Agony of Defeat

Trump was not just debating Kamala; the so-called moderators were biased lackies for the undemocratically chosen presidential elect for the Democrats.

An Op Ed From our Friends

September 10th may prove to be a day that lives in infamy, not because of the two participants in the 2024 Presidential Debate but rather the moderators, who by all legitimate accounts met the definition of what Roone Arledge of their own Network’s fame coined suffered “The Agony of Defeat.”

ICYMI Live video in X Space with pre and post debate discussions included

The Debate We Have Been Waiting For

It is the very sad really, because they had the opportunity to vet two people for the highest office of the land and perhaps the free world. David Muir and Linsey Davis could have used their 90 minutes to probe the minds of the candidates to better understand what everyday Americans truly wanted to know about, but they could not help themselves. The moderators had to go all in for one side, and it became obvious almost immediately who would become the beneficiary of their bias.

If the questions were not bad enough. the factchecking of one side over the other was abhorrent. Kamala Harris was allowed by Muir and Davis to repeat long debunked lies from Charlottesville and January 6th unless reminded by President Trump of the actual facts at hand. The fact is that Kamala Harris has failed miserably; as the sitting Vice President she has the ability to influence both domestic and foreign policy decisions right now as well as for the last three and a half years.

While it may be true that President Trump did not have a perfect debate performance, his comment following the debate indicated both his and the frustration of the American People when he said he was debating three people, referring to the moderators as well as his debate opponent.
(See Fox Interview of Trump on 09.11.24)

Finally, there was an issue many people pointed out on the internet during and after the debate. Allegedly it appeared that the Vice President was wearing an earring that also doubles as a microphone and speaker. This device allows the wearer to be able to discreetly receive information while being unnoticed by others in their presence. If this is true, it begs the question, why weren’t mitigation in place to prevent the use of such a device during the debate. Many people noted that they could tell that she appeared to have been receiving timely information that advantaged her performance. A closer look at the video of the debate is now required to determine if the Vice President did in fact engage in cheating. If ABC was aware of this conduct and failed to reveal it, they engaged in election interference in a very bold way. However, their conduct on its face was enough to qualify in that regard.

We have a corrupt, biased and disgusting media willing to go to any length to damage Former President Trump. How can We the People pretend any longer that it is okay to do this again? Future debates should be cancelled, and the focus must shift to Election Integrity; only then will we truly taste the “Thrill of Victory!”

Click HERE for more articles From Our Friends

**********************************
Remember it’s
Your Community, Your Town
****
LinkTree list of Platforms
****
Curated list of 𝕏Spaces
hosted by America Mission™:
SpacesDashboard AM Collection
****
Peruse our collection of videos
on Rumble, Pilled, and Kick.
**********************************